Development, commissioning, and evaluation of a new intensity modulated minibeam proton therapy system
At a Glance
Section titled āAt a Glanceā| Metadata | Details |
|---|---|
| Publication Date | 2018-07-16 |
| Journal | Medical Physics |
| Authors | J Farr, V Moskvin, Renin Lukose, S. Tuomanen, P Tsiamas |
| Institutions | St. Jude Childrenās Research Hospital |
| Citations | 24 |
Abstract
Section titled āAbstractāPurpose To invent, design, construct, and commission an intensity modulated minibeam proton therapy system ( IMMPT ) without the need for physical collimation and to compare its resulting conformity to a conventional IMPT system. Methods A proton therapy system (Hitachi, Ltd, Hitachi City, Japan; Model: ProbeatāV) was specially modified to produce scanned minibeams without collimation. We performed integral depth dose acquisitions and calibrations using a large diameter parallelāplate ionization chamber in a scanning water phantom ( PTW , Freiburg, Germany; Models: Bragg Peak ionization chamber, MP 3āP). Spot size and shape was measured using radiochromic film (Ashland Advanced Materials, Bridgewater NJ ; Type: EBT 3), and a synthetic diamond diode type scanned point by point in air ( PTW Models: MicroDiamond, MP 3āP). The measured data were used as inputs to generate a Monte Carloābased model for a commercial radiotherapy planning system ( TPS ) (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA ; Model: Eclipse v13.7.15). The regular ProBeatāV system (sigma ~2.5 mm) T PS model was available for comparison. A simulated base of skull case with small and medium targets proximal to brainstem was planned for both systems and compared. Results The spot sigma is determined to be 1.4 mm at 221 MeV at the isocenter and below 1 mm at proximal distances. Integral depth doses were indistinguishable from the standard spot commissioning data. The TPS fit the spot profiles closely, giving a residual error maximum of 2.5% in the spot penumbra tails (below 5% of maximum) from the commissioned energies 69.4 to 221.3 MeV. The resulting IMMPT plans were more conformal than the IMPT plans due to a sharper dose gradient (90ā10%) 1.5 mm smaller for the small target, and 1.3 mm for the large target, at a representative central axial water equivalent depth of 7 cm. Conclusions We developed, implemented, and tested a new IMMPT system. The initial results look promising in cases where treatments can benefit from additional dose sparing to neighboring sensitive structures.
Tech Support
Section titled āTech SupportāOriginal Source
Section titled āOriginal SourceāReferences
Section titled āReferencesā- 2009 - Investigation of the relative conformality and efficiency for a series of different spot sizes in intensity modulated proton therapy