Skip to content

Life Cycle and Economic Analyses of the Removal of Pesticides and Pharmaceuticals from Municipal Wastewater by Anodic Oxidation

MetadataDetails
Publication Date2021-03-25
JournalSustainability
AuthorsElena Surra, Manuela Correia, SĂłnia A. Figueiredo, Jaime Gabriel Silva, Joana Vieira
InstitutionsUniversidade Nova de Lisboa, Universidade de Vigo
Citations16
AnalysisFull AI Review Included

This analysis assesses the sustainability of implementing an Anodic Oxidation (AO) unit as a tertiary treatment for Pesticide and Pharmaceutical (PP) removal at a full-scale Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant (MWWTP), comparing Boron-Doped Diamond (BDD) and Mixed Metal Oxide (MMO) anodes.

  • Environmental Burden of PP: The presence of PP in the MWW effluent contributes significantly to existing environmental burdens, accounting for 85% of Human Carcinogenicity and 90% of Freshwater Toxicities (ReciPe2016/USEtox).
  • AO Operation Impact: Implementing the AO unit increases the overall environmental burdens of the system by 95% on average (USEtox), primarily due to the high electric energy consumption required for electrooxidation.
  • Mitigation via Cogeneration: The existing biogas cogeneration unit at the WWTP is crucial, as the renewable electricity produced partially compensates for the indirect environmental burdens associated with AO unit operation.
  • Electrode Environmental Trade-off: BDD anodes are environmentally more favorable than MMO anodes. However, the manufacturing of MMO anodes introduces significant toxicity burdens (e.g., Sulfidic Tailing from metal extraction) that often surpass the environmental benefits of PP removal.
  • Economic Viability: MMO configuration is clearly more advantageous economically, yielding a positive Net Return (NR) and an acceptable Payback Period (PbP) of 10.26 years.
  • BDD Economic Barrier: The high purchase cost of BDD anodes renders this configuration economically unviable, resulting in a Total Capital Investment (TCI) more than 10-fold higher than MMO and a negative Net Return.
  • Integrated Solution Required: Effective PP management requires an integrated approach combining upstream reduction of PP use/disposal and the adoption of energy-intensive removal technologies strongly supported by dedicated renewable energy sources.
ParameterValueUnitContext
WWTP Average Flow23,100m3/dayCurrent operational flow
AO Unit Hydraulic Retention Time (HRT)2hDesign parameter for 70% COD removal
Target COD Removal Efficiency (η)70%Assumed efficiency for PP removal
AO Unit Inlet COD (CODin)0.068kg O2/m3Based on WWTP effluent data
AO Unit Outlet COD (CODout)0.020kg O2/m3Calculated based on 70% removal
Electric Energy (EE) Consumption3.55kWh/m3Required for AO treatment
Specific Energy Consumption75kWh/kg CODremovedConservative value based on pilot scale
Current Density (J)300A/m2Fixed parameter for AO design
Total Anode Surface (A)2019m2Required surface area for full-scale operation
Total Operating Current (I)605,754ACalculated based on flow and COD removal
Operating Voltage (v)5.56VCalculated based on conductivity and J
Wastewater Conductivity (”)1500”S/cmUsed for voltage calculation
Optimum Electrode Spacing (d)0.3cmCalculated for proper system operation
BDD Anode Cost (Unitarian)1.5€/cm2Commercial cost for small electrode
MMO Anode Cost (Unitarian)842€/m2Estimated cost for large-scale application
MMO Pt Loading50g/m2Assumed coating density
AO Unit Lifetime20yearsUsed for depreciation and profitability analysis
Minimum Acceptable Rate of Return (mar)6%/yUsed for Net Return calculation

The sustainability assessment was based on Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) and Economic Analysis, following ISO 14040/14042 standards.

  1. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Framework:

    • Functional Unit: 1 m3 of raw wastewater (influent).
    • Impact Assessment Methods: ReCiPe2016 Endpoint (H) and USEtox (for ecotoxicity and human toxicity).
    • System Boundaries:
      • Boundary 1: Liquid phase treatment only (MWW to UV disinfection).
      • Boundary 2: Liquid and solid phase treatment, including biogas cogeneration for electric energy production (avoided burdens).
    • Avoided Burdens: Included partial re-use of treated water and avoided production of non-renewable electricity via biogas cogeneration.
  2. Anodic Oxidation (AO) Unit Design and Operation:

    • Reactor Design: Three sheltered reinforced concrete tanks (total capacity 2500 m3) equipped with 67 anode-cathode pairs.
    • Performance Assumption: AO unit achieves 70% removal efficiency for COD and PP, based on pilot-scale data (Urtiaga et al., Popescu et al.).
    • Cathode Material: Stainless steel (79.25 t/y).
  3. BDD Anode Manufacturing (CVD):

    • Substrate: Titanium plates.
    • Deposition Technique: Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD).
    • Reactive Gases: Methane (1% CH4 in H2) doped with Trimethyl Boron (1-3 ppm).
    • Scale-up: Gas flows and energy consumption were scaled up using a geometrical factor (1.01E+07) based on the ratio of full-scale to lab-scale anode area.
  4. MMO Anode Manufacturing (Thermal Decomposition):

    • Substrate: Titanium plates/wires.
    • Coating Process: Painting with an MMO solution (assumed Pt oxides) followed by thermal treatment at 400 °C.
    • Thermal Treatment Scheme: Multi-step heating (130 °C for water evaporation, 250 °C for adhesion, final calcination for metal oxide formation).
  5. Economic Analysis:

    • Methodology: Based on Timmerhaus and Peters (Delivered Equipment Method).
    • Key Metrics: Total Capital Investment (TCI), Total Annual Treatment Cost (TTC), Return of Investment (ROI), Payback Period (PbP), and Net Return (NR).
    • Revenue Assumption: Revenues derived only from public taxes for MWW treatment and sale of cogenerated electric energy to the national grid.

The research directly addresses the implementation of advanced electrochemical processes in large-scale municipal infrastructure, focusing on the material science and economic viability of electrode selection.

  • Wastewater Treatment (Tertiary): Implementation of Anodic Oxidation (AO) as a final polishing step to remove persistent organic pollutants (PPs) that bypass conventional biological treatment.
  • Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation Processes (EAOPs): Commercial deployment of BDD and MMO electrodes for the degradation of bio-refractory organic waste streams, including landfill leachates and industrial effluents.
  • Electrode Manufacturing: High-volume production of dimensionally stable anodes (DSA), specifically:
    • BDD Electrodes: Used where high current efficiency, chemical stability, and low fouling are critical, despite high capital cost (e.g., specialized industrial effluent treatment).
    • MMO Electrodes: Used for large-scale, cost-sensitive applications like chlorine alkali production and water electrolysis, now being adapted for wastewater treatment due to lower TCI.
  • Sustainable Infrastructure Design: Providing data for engineers and policymakers to integrate renewable energy sources (like biogas cogeneration) directly into energy-intensive treatment processes to meet sustainability goals.
View Original Abstract

Several pesticides and pharmaceuticals (PP) have been detected in the effluent of a full-scale Portuguese Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). Their presence contributed to the environmental burdens associated with the existing treatment of the Municipal Wastewater (MWW) in the impact categories of Human Carcinogenicity, Non-Carcinogenicity, and Freshwater toxicities on average by 85%, 60%, and 90%, respectively (ReciPe2016 and USEtox methods). The environmental and economic assessment of the installation of an Anodic Oxidation (AO) unit for PPs’ removal was performed through Life Cycle and Economic Analysis, considering two types of anodes, the Boron-Doped Diamond (BDD) and the Mixed Metal Oxides (MMO). The operation of the AO unit increased the environmental burdens of the system by 95% on average (USEtox), but these impacts can be partially compensated by the avoided the production of non-renewable energy in the Portuguese electricity mix by biogas cogeneration at the WWTP. If the construction of the AO unit and the manufacturing of the electrodes are considered, the Human and Freshwater Toxicities are often higher than the environmental benefits derived from the PPs’ removal. On the economic side, the MMO configuration is clearly more advantageous, whereas BDD is environmentally more favorable. The issue of the presence of PP in MWW effluents has to be addressed as an integrated solution both improving upstream PP’s management and adopting PP’s removal technologies strongly supported by renewable energies. Further insights are needed for the assessment of fate and of the environmental effects of PP in the sludge.

  1. 2019 - Assessment of 83 pharmaceuticals in WWTP influent and effluent samples by UHPLC-MS/MS: Hourly variation [Crossref]
  2. 2019 - Pharmaceuticals and pesticides in secondary effluent wastewater: Identification and enhanced removal by acid-activated ferrate(VI) [Crossref]
  3. 2019 - Pyrethroid pesticide residues in a municipal wastewater treatment plant: Occurrence, removal efficiency, and risk assessment using a modified index [Crossref]
  4. 2020 - Occurrence of pesticides in surface water, pesticides removal efficiency in drinking water treatment plant and potential health risk to consumers in Tengi River Basin, Malaysia [Crossref]
  5. 2020 - Assessing the combined toxicity effects of three neonicotinoid pesticide mixtures on human neuroblastoma SK-N-SH and lepidopteran Sf-9 cells [Crossref]
  6. 2001 - Toxicity of pesticides to aquatic microorganisms: A review [Crossref]
  7. 2020 - Pesticides pollution: Classifications, human health impact, extraction and treatment techniques [Crossref]
  8. 2018 - Occurrence and fate of emerging contaminants in municipal wastewater treatment plants from different geographical regions—A review [Crossref]