Skip to content

Verification and validation of zero-point electron-phonon renormalization of the bandgap, mass enhancement, and spectral functions

MetadataDetails
Publication Date2025-05-03
Journalnpj Computational Materials
AuthorsSamuel Poncé, Jae-Mo Lihm, Cheol-Hwan Park
Citations5
AnalysisFull AI Review Included

This study provides a rigorous verification and validation (V&V) of computational methods used to calculate electron-phonon (e-ph) renormalization effects in semiconductors, focusing on diamond and boron arsenide (BAs).

  • Code Verification: Demonstrated excellent agreement (maximum difference of 1.4 meV for CBM ZPR in BAs) between independent implementations of the non-adiabatic Allen-Heine-Cardona (AHC) theory in ABINIT and Quantum ESPRESSO (QE), and the Wannier Function Perturbation Theory (WFPT) in EPW.
  • Methodology Validation: Confirmed the validity of the non-adiabatic AHC approach for both infrared (IR)-inactive (diamond) and IR-active (BAs) materials, validating the use of DFPT and WFPT for these complex calculations.
  • Debye-Waller Term Insight: Found that the Debye-Waller (DW) self-energy term is momentum-dependent, which is critical for accurate mass enhancement calculations and invalidates common approximations (like the Luttinger approximation) when applied outside the active subspace.
  • Convergence Challenge: Quantified the extremely slow convergence of the sum-over-state approach for zero-point renormalization (ZPR), requiring up to 600 bands for diamond and over 1200 bands for BAs to match the Sternheimer-based results.
  • Spin-Orbit Coupling (SOC) Impact: Verified that SOC has a small impact (less than 3% reduction) on the ZPR of the bandgap, but significantly affects the imaginary part of the self-energy (up to 23% reduction at the VBM in BAs), which is crucial for carrier mobility modeling.
ParameterValueUnitContext
Diamond Indirect Gap ZPR (Non-Adiabatic AHC)330.2meVABINIT/QE agreement at 0 K
BAs Indirect Gap ZPR (Non-Adiabatic AHC)94.6meVABINIT/QE agreement at 0 K
Diamond VBM ZPR (Non-Adiabatic AHC)131.9meVABINIT result at 0 K
Diamond CBM ZPR (Non-Adiabatic AHC)-198.3meVABINIT result at 0 K
Diamond Electron Longitudinal Mass (m*l)1.89m0Renormalized, AHC theory
Diamond Electron Transverse Mass (m*t)0.33m0Renormalized, AHC theory
BAs Thermal Conductivity (Reported)~1000W/mKContext for BAs selection
DFT Plane-Wave Cutoff40HaStandard calculations
ZG Supercell Plane-Wave Cutoff80RyUsed for large supercell convergence (up to 1458 atoms)
SOC Impact on ZPR (Diamond)< 3%Reduction in ZPR
SOC Impact on Imaginary Self-Energy (BAs VBM)23%Reduction in imaginary part of self-energy

The V&V effort compared four first-principles codes (ABINIT, Quantum ESPRESSO, EPW, ZG) across three primary theoretical methods: DFPT-AHC, WFPT-AHC, and adiabatic frozen-phonon (ZG).

  1. DFT and DFPT Setup: Calculations used the PBE functional and norm-conserving pseudopotentials (PseudoDojo v0.4.1). Self-consistent cycles were converged to tight tolerances (10-20 Ry2/e2 or smaller).
  2. Fixed Lattice Approximation: Thermal expansion was neglected; calculations used fixed lattice parameters (Diamond: 6.7035 Bohr; BAs: 9.0850 Bohr).
  3. Long-Range Electrostatics: Dynamical quadrupoles were explicitly included in the long-range part of the perturbed potential for accurate interpolation, essential for IR-active BAs.
  4. Momentum Integration (q-Grid): Initial calculations used coarse 8 x 8 x 8 q-grids. Final converged results relied on dense 100 x 100 x 100 q-grids, achieved via interpolation techniques.
  5. Perturbative Methods (AHC):
    • DFPT Implementation (ABINIT/QE): Used the Sternheimer equation to compute the rest-space contribution of the self-energy, overcoming the slow convergence of the sum-over-state approach.
    • WFPT Implementation (EPW): Used maximally localized Wannier functions to interpolate the full electron-phonon matrix elements, including Berry connection terms.
  6. Non-Perturbative Method (ZG): The adiabatic ZPR was computed using the Special Displacement Method (SDM) on large supercells (up to 9 x 9 x 9, 1458 atoms) to validate the perturbative results.
  7. Approximation Testing: The accuracy of various approximations for mass enhancement was tested, including Fan-only, active-space only, and Luttinger approximations, confirming the necessity of including the momentum-dependent DW term.

The verified computational methods and the resulting data are crucial for the reliable design and optimization of next-generation electronic and thermal materials.

Industry/ApplicationRelevance to Research Findings
Wide-Bandgap SemiconductorsProvides validated ZPR and effective mass data for diamond and BAs, enabling accurate modeling of band structure and carrier transport for high-power, high-frequency devices (e.g., RF amplifiers, power converters).
Advanced Thermal ManagementBAs, known for its ultra-high thermal conductivity, requires accurate electronic modeling. Verified ZPR calculations ensure that bandgaps and mobility predictions remain reliable under high-heat operating conditions.
Computational Materials DesignThe V&V effort validates the reliability of major open-source codes (ABINIT, QE, EPW) for excited-state properties, accelerating the discovery and simulation of new materials with tailored e-ph coupling characteristics.
Quantum TechnologiesAccurate modeling of e-ph interactions is fundamental for understanding and mitigating decoherence in solid-state quantum systems, such as defects in diamond (NV centers), improving the stability of quantum sensors and processors.
Carrier Mobility EngineeringThe detailed analysis of the momentum-dependent Debye-Waller term provides necessary theoretical refinement for calculating precise carrier mobilities, leading to better predictive models for semiconductor performance.
View Original Abstract

Abstract Verification and validation of methods and first-principles software are at the core of computational solid-state physics but are too rarely addressed. We compare four first-principles codes: ABINIT, Quantum ESPRESSO, EPW, ZG, and three methods: (i) the Allen-Heine-Cardona theory using density functional perturbation theory (DFPT), (ii) the Allen-Heine-Cardona theory using Wannier function perturbation theory (WFPT), and (iii) an adiabatic non-perturbative frozen-phonon method. For these cases, we compute the real and imaginary parts of the electron-phonon self-energy in diamond and BAs, including dipoles and quadrupoles when interpolating. We find excellent agreement between software that implements the same formalism as well as good agreement between the DFPT and WFPT methods. Importantly, we find that the Deybe-Waller term is momentum dependent which impacts the mass enhancement, yielding approximate results when using the Luttinger approximations. Finally, we compare the electron-phonon spectral functions between ABINIT and EPW and find excellent agreement even away from the band edges.