Fast Beam Scanning and Accurate Output Factor Measurements for Small-Field Dosimetry Using a Novel Scintillation Detector
At a Glance
Section titled “At a Glance”| Metadata | Details |
|---|---|
| Publication Date | 2025-08-26 |
| Journal | bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) |
| Authors | Yiding Han, Jingzhu Xu, Yao Hao, Baozhou Sun |
| Institutions | St. Luke’s Medical Center, Washington University in St. Louis |
| Analysis | Full AI Review Included |
Executive Summary
Section titled “Executive Summary”The study validates the Blue Physics Plastic Scintillation Detector (BP-PSD Model 11) as a superior tool for small-field dosimetry, emphasizing speed and accuracy in clinical quality assurance (QA).
- Correction-Free Dosimetry: The BP-PSD is water-equivalent, energy-independent, and dose-rate independent, eliminating the need for field output correction factors (k-value = 1) required by micro-diamond and micro-silicon detectors (TRS 483).
- Significant Time Savings: The fast-scan mode allows complete profile and Percentage Depth Dose (PDD) datasets across multiple small fields (down to 0.5x0.5 cm2) to be acquired in less than 8 minutes, compared to approximately 40 minutes required by conventional detectors.
- Accurate Output Factors (FOF): FOF measurements showed excellent agreement with reference detectors (Exradin W2, micro-diamond, micro-silicon diode). Maximum variation was 1.6% at the smallest field size (0.5x0.5 cm2), significantly improving upon previous literature reports (12%).
- Novel Indirect PDD Method: A profile-based technique was introduced to derive PDD curves from 62 fast lateral scans, achieving 100% gamma passing rate (3%/1mm) for extremely small fields (1x1 cm2) against TPS simulation, while inherently minimizing errors from detector misalignment and beam inclination.
- High Consistency: Direct PDD measurements achieved a 98% gamma passing rate (3%/1mm) against an Ion Chamber reference for 3x3 cm2 and 10x10 cm2 fields. Penumbra measurements (80%-20%) agreed with micro-diamond and micro-silicon detectors with less than 1% variation.
Technical Specifications
Section titled “Technical Specifications”| Parameter | Value | Unit | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Detector Type | BP-PSD Model 11 | N/A | Plastic Scintillation Detector |
| Scintillator Core Material | Polystyrene | N/A | Doped with fluorescent compounds |
| Sensitivity Volume (Cylinder) | 1 x 1 | mm | Diameter x Length (0.785 mm3 volume) |
| Response Time | Nanoseconds | N/A | Short fluorescence decay time |
| Acquisition Mode | Pulse-to-pulse | N/A | Raw data reflects individual linac pulses |
| Integration Window | 750 | µs | Dual-channel interleaved integrator circuits |
| ACR (Cerenkov Correction Factor) | 0.963 | N/A | Adjacent Channel Ratio determined experimentally |
| Scanning Speed (Small Fields) | 10 | mm/s | Used for fields ≤ 3x3 cm2 |
| Scanning Speed (Large Fields) | 20 | mm/s | Used for fields 10x10 cm2 |
| FOF Variation (1x1 cm2) | < 1 | % | Variation between BP-PSD and other detectors |
| FOF Variation (0.5x0.5 cm2) | 1.6 | % | Variation between BP-PSD and micro-diamond |
| Indirect PDD Scan Time | 12 | minutes | Total time for 62 profiles (0 to 280 mm depth) |
| Indirect PDD Gamma Pass Rate | 100 | % | 3%/1mm criteria, referenced to TPS simulation (1x1 cm2) |
| Direct PDD Gamma Pass Rate | 98 | % | 3%/1mm criteria, referenced to Ion Chamber (3x3 cm2) |
Key Methodologies
Section titled “Key Methodologies”The dosimetric evaluation was performed on a Varian TrueBeam 6XFFF photon beam using a PTW BeamScan water tank system.
- Detector Comparison: BP-PSD Model 11 was benchmarked against four reference instruments: Exradin W2 (PSD), PTW micro-diamond (TN60019), PTW micro-silicon diode (TN60023), and a large-volume Ion Chamber (TN31013).
- Cerenkov Light Correction: The system utilized two channels (Sensor Rs and Cerenkov Rc). The Cerenkov contribution was removed using the Adjacent Channel Ratio (ACR) formula, determined experimentally to be 0.963.
- Data Acquisition and Smoothing: Raw pulse-by-pulse data from the BP-PSD was processed using in-house software. A rolling smoothing technique with a 40 ms window was applied to reduce noise and facilitate comparison with integrating detectors.
- Scanning Speeds:
- BP-PSD: 10 mm/s (for fields ≤ 3x3 cm2) and 20 mm/s (for 10x10 cm2).
- Reference Detectors (PDD/Profiles): 2 mm/s or 1 mm/s (significantly slower).
- Field Output Factor (FOF) Measurement: FOFs (Ω) were measured at two depths (5 cm and 10 cm) for field sizes ranging from 0.5x0.5 cm2 to 4x4 cm2, referenced to a 10x10 cm2 jaw-defined field. A k-value of 1 was applied for all PSD measurements.
- Indirect PDD Measurement (Novel Method):
- 62 lateral beam profiles were scanned (10 mm/s speed) from the water surface down to 280 mm depth (total time: 12 minutes).
- The PDD value at each depth was derived by identifying the peak dose of the corresponding lateral profile, thereby bypassing errors associated with vertical detector drift or beam inclination.
- Evaluation Criteria: PDD curves were analyzed using 1D gamma passing rates (3%/1mm and 2%/2mm). Beam profiles were evaluated by comparing penumbra lengths (lateral distance between 80% and 20% isodose lines).
Commercial Applications
Section titled “Commercial Applications”The BP-PSD Model 11 is specifically designed to enhance efficiency and accuracy in high-precision radiation therapy environments.
- Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) and Therapy (SRT/SABR): Provides accurate dosimetry for extremely small fields (down to 0.5x0.5 cm2) where conventional detectors struggle with volume averaging and correction factors.
- Clinical Quality Assurance (QA): Enables significantly faster routine QA processes (5 to 10 times quicker), reducing linac downtime required for commissioning and daily checks.
- Dosimetry Commissioning: Facilitates rapid and accurate measurement of PDDs and beam profiles, especially for small fields, satisfying stringent accuracy and stability requirements.
- Water Tank Scanning Systems: The fast response time and indirect PDD method are uniquely practical for integration into existing scanning water tank systems (like PTW BeamScan), offering a high-throughput solution for large volumes of tasks.
View Original Abstract
Abstract Background The most used instruments for small-field dosimetry have notable limitations, including the need for correction factors, limited scanning speeds, and challenges in alignment for percentage depth dose (PDD) measurements, particularly for extremely small-fields. However, plastic scintillation detectors (PSDs) are an attractive alternative for small-field dosimetry due to their correction-free nature, linear dose response, and fast response time. Purpose This study evaluates the robustness and accuracy of the dosimetric measurements using a new water-equivalent PSD in small-field dosimetry. The study also aims to report an indirect method for measuring PDD in small-fields, with a scanning time that is 5 to 10 times faster than traditional methods. Method PDDs, profiles and output factors were measured on a Varian TrueBeam 6XFFF photon beam for the field size of 0.5×0.5 cm 2 , 1×1 cm 2 , 2×2 cm 2 , 3×3 cm 2 , 4×4 cm 2 using a new PSD from Blue Physics (BP-PSD). These measurements were compared with those obtained using a well-established PSD (Standard Imaging W2), micro-diamond (TN60019, PTW-Freiburg, Germany), and micro-silicon detectors (TN60023, PTW-Freiburg, Germany). Owing to its fast response, the BP-PSD enabled the collection of beam profiles at 31 depths, which were used to derive the PDD while avoiding detector misalignment along the beam path. Data was collected in a water tank controlled by the PTW BeamScan software. The pulse-by-pulse raw data from BP-PSD were converted to respective dosimetry data using in-house software. Result The BP-PSD demonstrated excellent agreement with other detectors for small-field output factors (FOFs), with a maximum variation of 1.6%. The BP-PSD also showed strong agreements in PDD measurements with an ion chamber (TN31013) for both 3×3 cm 2 and 10×10 cm 2 field sizes, achieving a 98% gamma passing rate (gamma criteria: 1mm,3%). For the profile measurements, the BP-PSD showed consistency with both the micro-diamond and micro-silicon diode detectors, with less than 1% variation in measured penumbra length. At a 3×3 cm 2 field size, the measured penumbra length (4 mm) agreed with previously published data (3.86-4.2 mm). Additionally, for field size less than 3×3 cm 2 the indirect PDD measurements derived from profiles showed significant improvement compared to the direct measurements using various detectors, using TPS-calculated PDD as a reference. Conclusion The BP-PSD has proven to be a robust and reliable detector for small-field dosimetry. It exhibits excellent agreement with other detectors in measuring small FOFs and provides accurate measurements with significantly faster scanning speeds in a water tank. The fast response feature enables the indirect PDD measurement method
Tech Support
Section titled “Tech Support”Original Source
Section titled “Original Source”References
Section titled “References”- 2018 - Dosimetry of small static fields used in external photon beam radiotherapy: Summary of TRS-483, the IAEA-AAPM international Code of Practice for reference and relative dose determination
- 2019 - Evaluating small field dosimetry with the Acuros XB (AXB) and analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) dose calculation algorithms in the eclipse treatment planning system [Crossref]
- 2011 - Implementing a newly proposed Monte Carlo based small field dosimetry formalism for a comprehensive set of diode detectors [Crossref]
- 2018 - Different Dosimeters/Detectors Used in Small-Field Dosimetry: Pros and Cons [Crossref]
- 2020 - Khan’s The Physics of Radiation Therapy [Crossref]
- 2015 - Evaluation of Gafchromic EBT-XD film, with comparison to EBT3 film, and application in high dose radiotherapy verification [Crossref]
- 2013 - Small photon field dosimetry using EBT2 Gafchromic film and Monte Carlo simulation