Skip to content

Scrambling and quantum feedback in a nanomechanical system

MetadataDetails
Publication Date2022-02-01
JournalThe European Physical Journal D
AuthorsAbhayveer Singh, Kushagra Sachan, L. Chotorlishvili, V.S. Vipin, S. K. Mishra
InstitutionsBanaras Hindu University, RzeszĂłw University of Technology
Citations2
AnalysisFull AI Review Included

This research investigates the spread of quantum correlations in a hybrid nanomechanical system (NEMS) using the Out-of-Time Ordered Correlator (OTOC) as a quantifier for quantum feedback.

  • Core Value Proposition: OTOC is established as a direct measure of the strength of quantum feedback exerted by Nitrogen-Vacancy (NV) spins onto coupled nanomechanical oscillators.
  • System Architecture: The model comprises two NV spins coupled indirectly via two coupled nanomechanical nonlinear oscillators (NEMS). Spins are not directly coupled.
  • Key Finding (Classical Channel Failure): In all semi-classical and classical regimes (i.e., when the oscillators are nonlinear or undriven), the OTOC vanishes, demonstrating that classical channels cannot transfer quantum entanglement between the NV centers.
  • Quantum Requirement: Non-zero OTOC and entanglement spreading occur only when the coupling channel is inherently quantum (modeled by a linear quantum harmonic oscillator).
  • Regime Validation: The study numerically solved the coupled quantum-classical dynamics across various regimes (autonomous, driven, linear, nonlinear, weak/strong connectivity) to confirm the decay of entanglement in the classical limit.
  • Quantum Metrics: In the inherently quantum case, non-zero OTOC, Concurrence, and Geometric Measure of Entanglement (GME) were successfully calculated, confirming robust quantum correlation transfer.
ParameterValueUnitContext
NEMS Material StackGallium Arsenide (GaAs)N/ABase material for nanomechanical resonators
NEMS Layer 1 (n-doped)100nmThickness of the n-doped GaAs layer
NEMS Layer 2 (Insulating)50nmThickness of the insulating GaAs layer
NEMS Layer 3 (p-doped)50nmThickness of the p-doped GaAs layer
Quantum Feedback TemperatureT < 50nKRequired cryogenic temperature for the resonator to behave quantum mechanically
Weak Connectivity RegimeK < 1N/ACoupling strength (D/
Strong Connectivity RegimeK > 1N/ACoupling strength leading to synchronized oscillator motion
Example Spin Frequency (ω0)1.5ArbitraryUsed in numerical simulations (e.g., Fig. 2-7)
Example Resonator Frequenciesω1 = 1.0, ω2 = 1.5ArbitraryUsed in numerical simulations
Example Nonlinearity ConstantΟ = 1ArbitraryUsed in nonlinear oscillator regimes
Semi-Classical Limit (Thermal OTOC)n = 10 to 10000N/ANumber of oscillator quanta (n = <a+a>) used to simulate the classical limit

The study utilized a hybrid quantum-classical approach to model the coupled NV spins and nanomechanical oscillators, focusing on numerical integration and analytical transformation techniques.

  1. Hamiltonian Formulation: The total system dynamics were governed by a Hamiltonian H = Ho + Hs + Hint, where Ho describes the nonlinear oscillators (including damping Îł and nonlinearity Ο), Hs describes the NV spins, and Hint describes the spin-oscillator coupling (g).
  2. Coupled Dynamics Solution: The system was solved using a coupled set of equations: the Schrödinger equation for the spin wave function |ψ(t)> and the classical equations of motion (Newton’s second law with driving and damping) for the oscillator coordinates x1(t) and x2(t).
  3. Numerical Integration: The coupled equations (Eq. 6) were integrated numerically using the Runge-Kutta Method (RK45) to determine the time evolution of the wave function and oscillator positions across various dynamical regimes (autonomous, driven, linear, nonlinear).
  4. OTOC Quantification: The Out-of-Time Ordered Correlator (OTOC), C(t) = 1 - Re F(t), was calculated using the time-evolved Pauli operators of the NV spins to quantify the spread of quantum correlations and the strength of quantum feedback.
  5. Inherently Quantum Analysis (Linear Case): For the purely quantum regime (linear oscillator), the Fröhlich transformation method was applied to derive an effective Hamiltonian (Heff) describing the indirect interaction between the two NV spins mediated by the quantum harmonic oscillator.
  6. Quantum Correlation Metrics: In the inherently quantum case, the OTOC, Concurrence (C[t]), and Geometric Measure of Entanglement (GME) were calculated analytically and numerically to verify the preservation and transfer of entanglement.

The findings are highly relevant to the development and optimization of solid-state quantum technologies, particularly those relying on hybrid quantum-classical interfaces.

  • Quantum Computing Architectures: Designing robust quantum processors using solid-state qubits (like NV centers) where mechanical resonators are used as quantum buses or memory elements.
  • Hybrid Quantum Transduction: Engineering efficient transducers for converting quantum information between different physical domains (e.g., spin to mechanical motion or microwave photons) for long-distance quantum communication networks.
  • Ultra-Sensitive Quantum Sensing: Developing next-generation NEMS-based sensors (e.g., for mass spectrometry or magnetic field detection) that leverage the coherence and quantum feedback properties of NV centers to achieve sensitivity below classical limits.
  • Quantum Feedback Control Systems: Informing the design of control loops in quantum devices, ensuring that classical noise or semi-classical feedback channels do not degrade or destroy fragile quantum correlations (entanglement).
  • Cryogenic Quantum Device Engineering: Providing critical design constraints (e.g., T < 50 nK) for the cooling and operation of nanomechanical components required to maintain a purely quantum coupling channel.