Skip to content
6CCVD Research

Does intensification with UV light and US improve the sustainability of electrolytic waste treatment processes?

At a Glance

Section titled ā€œAt a Glanceā€
MetadataDetails
Publication Date2020-11-07
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
AuthorsCarmen M. FernĆ”ndezā€Marchante, F.L. Souza, MarĆ­a MillĆ”n, Justo Lobato, Manuel A. Rodrigo
InstitutionsUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha
Citations18

Abstract

Section titled ā€œAbstractā€

This work aims to assess the influence of ultrasounds (US) application or ultraviolet (UV) light irradiation on the efficiency and sustainability of the treatment of wastes by conductive diamond electrochemical oxidation (CDEO). To do this, a life cycle assessment (LCA) is carried out in order to quantify the environmental impacts of the intensified CDEO processes. Inventories of three bench scale remediation plants (CDEO, Sono-CDEO and Photo-CDEO) in which the different technologies are implemented are performed by means of Ecoinvent 3.3 data base. AWARE, USEtox, IPPC and ReCiPe methodologies are used to quantify the environmental burden into 5 midpoint (water footprint, global warming 100a, ozone layer depletion, human toxicity, freshwater ecotoxicity) and 17 endpoint impact categories. Photo-CDEO attains the faster and more efficient removal in terms of energy consumed. All impact categories are lower in the case in which UV light irradiation is coupled to the CDEO treatment, particularly if the electrolyte does not contain chloride anions. From the point of view of toxicity and ecotoxicity, it is essential to achieve a complete mineralization, because of the intermediates generated into wastes containing chloride anions can become more hazardous than the initial pesticide. The operation of these technologies at large current densities shows positive results from the sustainability point of view, despite the huge environmental impact related to the energy production. Data notice that almost a 99.0% of the total global warming potential is mainly due to the electricity required during the electrochemical treatment, being higher by the sono and photo CDEO treatments because of the use of additional devices. Nevertheless, this issue can be overcome by means of using renewable energies as power sources of these remediation treatments. According to results, it can be claimed that the electrochemical technologies may successfully compete with other AOPs in terms of sustainability.

Tech Support

Section titled ā€œTech Supportā€

Original Source

Section titled ā€œOriginal Sourceā€

References

Section titled ā€œReferencesā€
  1. 2018 - Mercury toxicity: ecological features of organic phase of mercury in Biota- Part I. Arc. Org. Inorg
  2. 2017 - LCA Water Footprint AWARE characterization factor based on local specific conditions [Crossref]
  3. 2019 - Environmental impacts of an advanced oxidation process as tertiary treatment in a wastewater treatment plant
  4. 2014 - Electrochemical advanced oxidation processes: an overview of the current applications to actual industrial effluents
  5. 2004 - Electrochemical destruction of chlorophenoxy herbicides by anodic oxidation and electro-Fenton using a boron-doped diamond electrode [Crossref]
  6. 2001 - Application of life cycle assessment to chemical processes [Crossref]
  7. 2009 - Costs of the electrochemical oxidation of wastewaters: a comparison with ozonation and Fenton oxidation processes [Crossref]
  8. 2009 - Synthesis of novel oxidants by electrochemical technology [Crossref]

Reads Similar to This

Synergistic effect of electrooxidation and anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge for microbial inactivation Serendipitous discovery of quadruply imaged quasars - two diamonds Magnetic Resonance Study of Bulky CVD Diamond Disc