Skip to content

Analysis of the Association between Image by Face Shape and Personal Color Type

MetadataDetails
Publication Date2022-10-27
JournalJournal of the Korean Society of Cosmetology
AuthorsGahyun Kim, Min-Lyoung Choi
InstitutionsSeokyeong University
Citations1
AnalysisFull AI Review Included

This study investigates the correlation between perceived image based on facial geometry (face shape) and established personal color types (Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winter) to propose a new, objective diagnostic parameter for the beauty industry.

  • Core Value Proposition: Face shape image is validated as a statistically significant variable (p=0.075) for personal color diagnosis, mitigating reliance solely on subjective skin color assessment.
  • Sample and Scope: Analysis conducted on 504 women in their 20s, utilizing visual assessment by 8 experienced beauty experts.
  • Spring Type Correlation: Strongly associated with round and egg-shaped faces, linked to “cheerful,” “youthful,” and “innocent” images.
  • Winter Type Correlation: Strongly associated with square, diamond, and inverted triangle shapes, linked to “confident,” “cool,” and “sharp” images.
  • Summer Type Correlation: Broad distribution across round, oval, inverted triangle, and diamond shapes, correlating with “friendly,” “gentle,” and “intellectual” images.
  • Methodology: Sensory evaluation (draping) combined with expert consensus on face shape classification under controlled 5000K lighting conditions.
  • Application Potential: Findings support the development of AI/IT-based beauty services (e.g., smart mirrors, smartphone apps) that use facial geometry recognition for automated color recommendations.
ParameterValueUnitContext
Sample Size (N)504peopleFemale subjects, age 20s
Statistical Significance (Chi-squared)23.467 (p=0.075)N/AAssociation between face shape and personal color type distribution
Diagnosis Lighting Standard5000KelvinControlled environment simulating natural sunlight
Expert Panel Experience10+yearsMinimum experience in makeup and personal color fields
Total Personal Color Types Identified4typesSpring (10.1%), Summer (36.5%), Autumn (28.0%), Winter (25.4%)
Most Frequent Face Shape141 (28.0)N (%)Square-shaped
Least Frequent Face Shape17 (3.4)N (%)Egg-shaped/Oval face
Spring Type Dominant Face Shape12 (10.8)N (%)Round-shaped
Autumn Type Dominant Face Shape30 (41.1)N (%)Long-shaped
  1. Subject Recruitment and Screening: 550 female students (20s) were initially recruited; 504 were selected after excluding those with recent artificial skin treatments (e.g., tanning) or temporary physiological changes affecting skin color.
  2. Controlled Measurement Environment: Experiments were conducted in a dedicated laboratory (Yudam Hall 518, SeoKyeong University) equipped with 5000K lighting (KSA3011 standard) to ensure accurate, consistent color temperature for visual assessment.
  3. Face Shape Classification: Face shapes were categorized into six types (Square, Egg/Oval, Long, Diamond, Round, Inverted Triangle). Classification was determined by consensus (majority agreement) among 8 experts based on facial outline, jaw/forehead angles, and length/width ratios.
  4. Image Feature Quantification: Subjects completed self-assessment questionnaires to quantify the perceived image characteristics (e.g., “active,” “intellectual,” “cool”) associated with their specific face shape, using scales derived from prior research.
  5. Personal Color Diagnosis (Sensory Evaluation): Personal color type (Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winter) was determined by the 8 experts using visual assessment (sensory evaluation) with 80-color draping cloths (CML Beauty Design Center).
  6. Statistical Correlation Analysis: Frequency analysis and Chi-squared testing (using SPSS 25.0) were performed to assess the statistical dependency between the determined face shape and the diagnosed personal color type.

The integration of facial geometry and image perception data into color diagnosis is highly relevant for the following industries and applications:

  • AI/IT Beauty Services: Development of advanced algorithms for personalized beauty recommendations via Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as smart mirrors and smartphone applications.
  • Automated Diagnosis Systems: Creating a standardized, objective parameter (face shape image) to reduce diagnostic errors caused by subjective expert judgment or environmental variations in skin color assessment.
  • Cosmetic and Fashion Retail: Enhancing user-customized product recommendations (e.g., eyeshadow, lipstick, clothing tones) by integrating facial geometry data with color theory.
  • Virtual Try-On Technology: Improving the accuracy and realism of virtual makeup and hair styling simulations by incorporating the user’s inherent facial image characteristics.
  • Beauty Education and Consulting: Providing a new, measurable standard for training personal color consultants, supplementing traditional skin and eye color analysis.
View Original Abstract

We analysed 504 women in their 20s in order to find out an association between personal color types and images by face shape. The findings of this study showed that images by face shape may work as one of variables in personal color diagnosis. First, ‘spring’ personal color saw round- or egg-shaped face be the most frequent in its distribution. This means ‘cheerful’, ‘youthful’, ‘young-looking’, ‘pretty’ images a round-shaped face invokes and ‘innocent’ image an oval face creates may be a meaningful standard in diagnosing ‘spring’ personal color. Second, among those the most frequently distributed in ‘summer’ personal color were a round-shaped face, an oval face, an inverted triangle-shaped face and a diamond- shaped face. This show ‘friendly’, and ‘gentil’ images of a round-shape face and ‘soft’, ‘natural’, ‘friendly’, ‘warm’ or ‘gentle’ images of an oval face may be a meaningful criterion in ‘summer’ personal color diagnosis; and a ‘trustworthy’ or ‘faithful’ images of square-shaped face and ‘intellectual’ image of an inverted triangle-shaped face may be also a significant standard in ‘summer’ personal color diagnosis. Third, a diamond-shaped face and a long- shaped face were the most often distributed in ‘autumn’ personal color. This shows ‘mature’ image of a diamond-shaped face and ‘mature’, ‘composed’, ‘adult’, calm’, ‘intellectual’, ‘classic’, ‘feminine’ or ‘lofty’ images of a long-shaped face may be a meaningful measurement in ‘autumn’ personal color diagnosis. Fourth, ‘winter’ personal color saw square-shaped face, a diamond-shaped face and an inverted triangle-shaped face the most frequently distributed in it. This means ‘confident’ or ‘active’ images of a square-shaped face, ‘cool’ image of a diamond-shaped face and ‘cool’ or ‘sharp’ images of an inverted triangle-shaped face may be a meaningful criterion in diagnosing ‘winter’ personal color. In conclusion, an important implication is that images of face shape might be a new standard in personal color diagnosis, further stimulating a variety of beauty service based on face perception consumers can enjoy by using smart phone or smart mirror.

  1. 2019 - A Study on Personal Color Diagnosis and Evaluation Characteristics of Results
  2. 2011 - A Comparison Analysis of the Skin Color According to Seasonal Types in personal Color Systems
  3. 2020 - Trend in Face type Classification for user-customized Makeup Recommendations
  4. 2005 - The Influence of the Eyebrow Make-up on Facial Image
  5. 2013 - Differences in Appearance Management Behavior in Accordance with Personal Color Awareness of Single Women of 20-30’s