Jewish Theology Unbound by James A. Diamond (review)
At a Glance
Section titled âAt a Glanceâ| Metadata | Details |
|---|---|
| Publication Date | 2020-11-01 |
| Journal | AJS Review The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies |
| Authors | Aaron Koller |
Abstract
Section titled âAbstractâReviewed by: Jewish Theology Unbound by James A. Diamond Aaron Koller James A. Diamond. Jewish Theology Unbound. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. 304 pp. doi:10.1017/S0364009420000124 In his commentary on Exodus 20, Abraham ibn Ezra reports that his friend, Judah Halevi, asked him why God identifies himself as âyour God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt,â rather than âyour God, who created heaven and earthâand who created you!â James Diamond reads this question as a fundamental inquiry into the nature of God and the nature of a relationship with God. Is God a philosophical ideal, a âprime mover,â a âfirst cause,â knowable through contemplation of divine perfection? Or is God a living, breathing entity, immensely powerful but dynamic, capable of growth and change? Diamond is a prolific and erudite scholar of Jewish thought, whose work has ranged over the whole canon, from the Bible to moderns such as the Piaseczner Rebbe and Leonard Cohen, with a primary focus on medieval Jewish thought. But here he is writing not as a scholar of Jewish thought, collecting and analyzing writings by others, but as a producer of Jewish thought, sifting those writings, synthesizing them, and adding to them, to produce a modern Jewish theology. This is framed as a polemical book, a rejection of the view that Judaism has no theology, no thought, and therefore no soul, and is simply a lawbook for the body, corporeal in its approach and devoid of any deeper abstract reflections. Rather than questioning the view that theology is more significant than actions, Diamond argues that this portrayal is simply wrong, and that Jewish theology is just as profound as the theologies found in other religious traditions. The nature of God is most thoroughly explored in chapter 3, on the names of God. Diamond posits that the âineffableâ name, the tetragrammaton, is itself a statement of Godâs becoming, of divine dynamism rather than constancy. This is argued, as is everything else in the book, through a close reading of key biblical texts, illuminated by the widest range of exegetical guides: rabbinic midrash, medieval commentators (including those like Gersonides, Abarbanel, and Isaac Arama, who are rarely encountered in academic scholarship) and modern scholarship. The following chapter focuses on the various ways in which Godâs name is desacralized for the sake of humanity. This can take the form of literal erasure, as when the name of God is dissolved in order to preserve a marriage in Numbers 5; Diamond quotes Levinasâs paraphrase of this as âthe effacement of the Name is the reconciliation of men.â But it can also take less dramatic form, such as the Mishnahâs injunction to use the name of God in greeting others (Berakhot 9:5). For example, in discussing Godâs name as revealed in Exodus 3:13, Diamond provides a rich discussion of Mosesâs biography leading up to the [End Page 411] burning bush that deepens readersâ understanding of the character of Moses in Exodus. Insightful readings abound, such as his interpretation of Exodus 2:12, when Moses goes out and sees âan Egyptian beating an Israeliteâ and then âturned here and there, and saw there was no ish.â On Diamondâs reading, Moses saw that there is no one who is simply âa man,â âwho has broken free of his ethnic/religious/national/tribal constraints in order to exercise his own individual humanityâ (77, see also 149). The book begins with a polemic against the caricature of Judaism as being about obedience and law, rather than concerned with freedom or theology. Diamond amply documents the centrality of both freedom and theology to Judaism, although I think the obsession with legal minutiae is not dispatched on those grounds. The first full chapter (2), entitled âBiblical Questioning: Philosophy Begins in Anguish,â focuses on another polemic, this time against Socrates, who said that philosophy begins in wonder. Diamond uses this chapter to study various questions in the Bible, and shows that many are existentially quite profound. From Godâs question to Adam, âWhere are you?â to the question to Cain, âWhere is your brother?â to Rebekahâs â[shriek] out of the agonizing pain ofâŚ