Feasibility of prototype diamond detectors for pulsed UHDR PBS small-field proton dosimetry for proton FLASH experiments
At a Glance
Section titled âAt a Glanceâ| Metadata | Details |
|---|---|
| Publication Date | 2025-09-02 |
| Journal | Physics in Medicine and Biology |
| Authors | Jufri Setianegara, Aoxiang Wang, N. GĂ©rard, Jarrick Nys, Marek SzczepaĆski |
| Institutions | Cyclotron (Netherlands), University of Kansas Medical Center |
Abstract
Section titled âAbstractâAbstract Objective. This study aims to investigate the responses of prototype diamond detectors under pulsed ultra-high dose rates (UHDRs) pencil-beam-scanning (PBS) protons from a compact proton synchrocyclotron (IBA ProteusÂźONE) for small-field UHDR dosimetry. Approach . flashDiamond detectors (fDs) were cross-calibrated with their relative proton responses characterized at conventional dose rates (CONV). Then, absolute UHDR dosimetry was performed and small-field response assessed. These experiments were also conducted with Razor Diode and microdiamond detectors (mDs) for cross-reference. Cross-calibrations were performed against an ADCL-calibrated PPC05 plane-parallel ionization chamber with 59.23 cGy nC â1 calibration coefficients. fDâs linearity, dose-rate, energy, and linear-energy-transfer (LET) responses were assessed under CONV protons. Pulsed UHDR PBS protons of 228 MeV were produced from a medical proton synchrocyclotron (IBA ProteusÂźONE) for 1.5 Ă 1.5-3.0 Ă 3.0 cm 2 square fields. Nominal absolute UHDR dosimetry was performed at 3 Ă 3 cm 2 field sizes with relative responses at smaller fields benchmarked against it. Main results . fD had 28.6 ± 0.1 cGy nC â1 sensitivities under CONV protons and were linear in response with dose-rate independence within ±0.50%. fD were similar to mD in proton energy and LET responses. However, there is an over-response of approximately 5.49%, 6.51% and 13.7% at the 226, 150 and 70 MeV Bragg peaks respectively. Under pulsed proton UHDR irradiation (0.80% s.t.d, 32.6 ± 0.5 cGy dose-per-pulse), fD responded within ±1% as PPC05 with negligible saturation. fD agreed within ±1% with other comparable small-field detectors under small-field UHDR beams and within ±2% of RayStation treatment planning system calculations. There is negligible partial volume averaging with fDs. Significance . Novel fD detectors did not saturate under pulsed UHDR PBS proton irradiation. Their miniscule active crystals make them suitable for small-field dosimetry but render them relatively insensitive compared to mDs. When cross-calibrated, they are suitable for absolute small-field UHDR dosimetry or for relative exit dosimetry monitoring purposes during UHDR radiobiological experiments.
Tech Support
Section titled âTech SupportâOriginal Source
Section titled âOriginal SourceâReferences
Section titled âReferencesâ- 2024 - Multi-institutional audit of FLASH and conventional dosimetry with a 3D printed anatomically realistic mouse phantom [Crossref]
- 2023 - The current status of FLASH particle therapy: a systematic review [Crossref]
- 2025 - Whole abdominal pencil beam scanned proton FLASH increases acute lethality [Crossref]
- 2024 - Preclinical ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) proton radiation therapy system for small animal studies [Crossref]
- 2022 - Determination of the ion collection efficiency of the Razor Nano Chamber for ultra-high dose-rate electron beams [Crossref]
- 2024 - Mechanisms of action in FLASH radiotherapy: a comprehensive review of physicochemical and biological processes on cancerous and normal cells [Crossref]
- 2021 - Spread-out Bragg peak proton FLASH irradiation using a clinical synchrocyclotron: proof of concept and ion chamber characterization [Crossref]
- 2020 - Feasibility of proton FLASH irradiation using a synchrocyclotron for preclinical studies [Crossref]
- 2024 - FLASH radiotherapy for the treatment of symptomatic bone metastases in the thorax (FAST-02): protocol for a prospective study of a novel radiotherapy approach [Crossref]
- 2023 - Definition of dose rate for FLASH pencil-beam scanning proton therapy: a comparative study [Crossref]